🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I historically shied away from heavy use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying games. My preference was for story direction and session development to be determined by character actions as opposed to pure luck. Recently, I opted to change my approach, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known streamed game utilizes a DM who often requests "chance rolls" from the players. The process entails choosing a polyhedral and defining potential outcomes contingent on the result. This is essentially no distinct from using a random table, these are devised in the moment when a character's decision lacks a obvious outcome.

I opted to test this approach at my own game, mainly because it seemed novel and provided a break from my normal practice. The results were eye-opening, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing balance between planning and randomization in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional In-Game Example

At a session, my party had just emerged from a city-wide battle. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Instead of deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant scene where the party discovered the corpses of their allies, forever clasped together in death. The party held a ceremony, which was particularly meaningful due to earlier roleplaying. As a final gesture, I improvised that the remains were miraculously restored, containing a enchanted item. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the party required to solve another critical quest obstacle. It's impossible to plan this type of serendipitous moments.

Improving Your Improvisation

This event made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are actually the core of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Adventurers reliably find joy in ignoring the most detailed plots. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to pivot effectively and invent content on the fly.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to deploy them for small-scale decisions that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I might use it to figure out if the party enter a room just in time to see a major incident occurs.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also works to maintain tension and create the feeling that the story is alive, shaping in reaction to their decisions immediately. It prevents the perception that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of storytelling.

This approach has long been integral to the original design. The game's roots were enamored with random tables, which made sense for a game focused on exploration. Even though current D&D frequently focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the required method.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly no issue with thorough preparation. However, it's also fine no problem with stepping back and allowing the dice to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Control is a big aspect of a DM's role. We need it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to cede it, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of advice is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Try a little chance for inconsequential outcomes. You might just find that the organic story beat is infinitely more powerful than anything you might have pre-written on your own.