🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."